9: 000011112333445 8: 1116689999999 7: 12 6: 89 5: 4: 124 3: 26
Most students received high score. One problem is that some students forgot to address at least one of the five requirements for each part (-1).
The most prevalent error was providing incorrect node sequences for the search methods (-1 or 2). However, many students also provided the wrong values for part d (-1).
The grading reference for each part is as follows: Attempting to do the problem and providing the correct expansion order are worth 5 points each per heuristic.
Most students got score 4 for this problem because they misidentified the search types (-1). Few students did not provide solution for this problem (-5).
Most students received full credit. Some others didn’t provide sufficient description about their solutions or made some slight mistakes (-1 or 2).Few students did not provide solution for this problem (-5).
a: 20 points b: 5 points c: 10 points d: 10 points e: 5 points
Errors: some students did not provide solution for this problem (-50). Students providing entire and mostly correct solutions got high scores (45~50).
Created by: En Cheng. Last Modified: 2008-02-11 by Zheng Liu.